Clear Review has joined Advanced - Discover our full suite of powerful and innovative people management solutions

Find out more
Back to blog

Appraisal Software vs Continuous Performance Management Software

Performance Management vs Continuous Performance Management.

What type of HR soft­ware is the best fit for your organisation’s culture?

When search­ing for per­for­mance man­age­ment soft­ware, it’s impor­tant to note that not all soft­ware sys­tems work in the same way. Each one will have a dif­fer­ent focus and will facil­i­tate your work life in dif­fer­ent ways. Before you invest in a per­for­mance man­age­ment soft­ware sys­tem, con­sid­er what’s impor­tant to your busi­ness, how you inter­act with your employ­ees and how you aim to man­age your employ­ees going forward.

Giv­en that most com­pa­nies are evolv­ing and mov­ing away from the annu­al appraisal, it is rea­son­able to assume that there will be an increased demand for con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment soft­ware. In this blog, we’ll cov­er the dif­fer­ences between appraisal soft­ware and con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment soft­ware. We’ll also explore how com­pa­nies are shift­ing away from bureau­cra­cy and towards a more for­ward-think­ing, flu­id per­for­mance man­age­ment style.

Mea­sur­ing per­for­mance vs improv­ing performance

There is a huge change in approach when you com­pare annu­al appraisals and con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment. Soft­ware designed to facil­i­tate annu­al appraisals has a focus on mea­sur­ing per­for­mance and com­pe­ten­cies. The soft­ware will dili­gent­ly track quan­ti­ta­tive data and pro­vide accu­rate graphs as a result, but the data won’t nec­es­sar­i­ly help man­age­ment and HR under­stand per­for­mance prob­lems and employ­ee engage­ment issues.

Con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment soft­ware, how­ev­er, tracks per­for­mance and uses com­pe­ten­cies and val­ues in order to improve and devel­op per­for­mance. This helps the com­pa­ny grow and achieve its goals in the long term.

Quan­ti­ta­tive vs qualitative

As men­tioned above, annu­al appraisals focus on form fill­ing and cap­tur­ing data. This is because man­agers haven’t had reg­u­lar meet­ings with their employ­ees through­out the year, so they need to take a year­ly oppor­tu­ni­ty to catch up and get as famil­iar with their per­for­mance and pro­gres­sion as possible.

The prob­lem is, when data is cap­tured so infre­quent­ly, it isn’t going to be tru­ly reflec­tive or help­ful. Employ­ees won’t feel sup­port­ed or encour­aged, and the ten­den­cy is to reduce an employ­ee to a num­ber, which is detri­men­tal to morale.

Con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment soft­ware, on the oth­er hand, is focused on enabling mean­ing­ful con­ver­sa­tions. This soft­ware allows for real-time feed­back, fre­quent check-ins and reg­u­lar reassess­ment of objec­tives. Rather than rely­ing on quan­ti­ta­tive data, this soft­ware encour­ages employ­ees and man­agers to devel­op a trust­ing rela­tion­ship, which is nec­es­sary for employ­ee engage­ment to flourish.

Annu­al per­for­mance reviews vs reg­u­lar per­for­mance and devel­op­ment check-ins’

Appraisal soft­ware is designed to sup­port the annu­al per­for­mance review. This means that it doesn’t have to sched­ule fre­quent meet­ings, and the soft­ware will sim­ply prompt you with reminders to sched­ule year­ly meet­ings and organ­ise forms to be filled out.

Con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment soft­ware, on the oth­er hand, is designed with reg­u­lar com­mu­ni­ca­tion in mind. The soft­ware will help employ­ees sched­ule and track meet­ings. It allows notes to be made, which can be accessed by any rel­e­vant par­ty at any time. It also allows HR to track how often one to one meet­ings are being held, to ensure all employ­ees are get­ting the feed­back they deserve.

Box-tick­ing feed­back vs ongo­ing, real-time feedback

Feed­back — both in terms of fre­quen­cy and qual­i­ty — is also an issue when it comes to appraisal soft­ware and con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment soft­ware. Annu­al per­for­mance reviews tend to cen­tre around 360-degree feed­back and box-tick­ing exer­cis­es, which have been shown not to work.

Con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment soft­ware, on the oth­er hand, deals with ongo­ing, real-time fre­quent feed­back. Man­ag­er and employ­ee are able to devel­op a rela­tion­ship, enjoy authen­tic com­mu­ni­ca­tion and dis­cuss per­for­mance-relat­ed mat­ters on a reg­u­lar basis. On top of this, the soft­ware is designed to per­mit for real-time feed­back, which can have a huge impact on employ­ee engage­ment levels.

Year­ly objec­tive set­ting vs agile near-term objectives

This is one of the most impor­tant per­for­mance man­age­ment con­sid­er­a­tions, because clear SMART objec­tives will keep your employ­ees on track and enthu­si­as­tic about their roles. Unclear or over­ly ambi­tious objec­tives, on the oth­er hand, will demo­ti­vate employ­ees and leave them unin­spired to excel.

Appraisal soft­ware is cen­tred on the set­ting, and mea­sure­ment, of long-term annu­al objec­tives. These objec­tives tend to become irrel­e­vant over the span of 12 months. Dynam­ic com­pa­nies gen­er­al­ly find that agile, near-term objec­tives that are updat­ed and dis­cussed reg­u­lar­ly are more help­ful in terms of advanc­ing the company.

Con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment soft­ware tracks SMART objec­tives and allows man­agers, employ­ees and HR to view objec­tives and assess progress. This con­stant re-eval­u­a­tion of objec­tives keeps employ­ees in-the-loop and engaged with regards to their goals and role while giv­ing them an under­stand­ing of how they con­tribute to over­all com­pa­ny objectives.

You have a lot of choice when it comes to per­for­mance review soft­ware. To find out what we can offer you and why you should choose Clear Review, get in touch with our team today for a free demo or a 15-minute per­for­mance man­age­ment consultation.