Back to Overview

What is an Effective Performance Management System? (Explained)

Performance management
Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter for inspiration, ideas and updates on the latest in performance management.

What com­pris­es an effec­tive per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tem and what is a per­for­mance man­age­ment cycle?

What is effec­tive per­for­mance management?

Com­pa­nies are increas­ing­ly fac­ing up to the chal­lenge of how to make per­for­mance man­age­ment suc­cess with­in their organ­i­sa­tion. The first step in this jour­ney is to under­stand what an effec­tive per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tem is.

In order to do this, we will address the fol­low­ing questions:

  • What is an effec­tive performance?
  • What does an effec­tive per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tem look like?
  • What are the stages of the per­for­mance man­age­ment cycle?

Per­for­mance Man­age­ment defined

When dis­cussing per­for­mance man­age­ment, many peo­ple imme­di­ate­ly think of per­for­mance reviews or annu­al appraisals. But this is only one com­po­nent of what is con­sid­ered to be per­for­mance man­age­ment. One of the best def­i­n­i­tions of per­for­mance man­age­ment is pro­vid­ed by Michael Arm­strong in his Hand­book of Per­for­mance Man­age­ment, which care­ful­ly and plain­ly lays out the Arm­strong per­for­mance man­age­ment cycle:

Per­for­mance man­age­ment is the con­tin­u­ous process of improv­ing per­for­mance by set­ting indi­vid­ual and team goals which are aligned to the strate­gic goals of the organ­i­sa­tion, plan­ning per­for­mance to achieve the goals, review­ing and assess­ing progress, and devel­op­ing the knowl­edge, skills and abil­i­ties of people.”

A key point here is that it is a con­tin­u­ous process, not a once-a-year activ­i­ty. Qual­i­ty per­for­mance man­age­ment should, there­fore, bring togeth­er a num­ber of dif­fer­ent, inte­grat­ed activ­i­ties to form an ongo­ing per­for­mance man­age­ment cycle’, as shown below.

What are the stages of the per­for­mance man­age­ment cycle?

Performance Management Cycle

In this sec­tion, we are going to explain the per­for­mance man­age­ment cycle and how imple­ment­ing this cycle could ben­e­fit your organisation.

The first stage of the Arm­strong per­for­mance man­age­ment cycle is the Plan­ning” phase for the forth­com­ing peri­od. Plan­ning should involve agree­ing on SMART objec­tives, a per­son­al devel­op­ment plan or actions and review­ing the job require­ments, updat­ing the role pro­file where nec­es­sary. His­tor­i­cal­ly, organ­i­sa­tions tend­ed to car­ry out this plan­ning stage once a year. How­ev­er, with the busi­ness envi­ron­ment becom­ing increas­ing­ly fast-mov­ing, so many organ­i­sa­tions are adapt­ing their process­es to set near-term” objec­tives every three months.

The organisation’s goals and val­ues should feed into per­for­mance plan­ning to ensure that indi­vid­ual per­for­mance is aligned with the over­all strat­e­gy of the organ­i­sa­tion. Specif­i­cal­ly, each SMART objec­tive should con­tribute to achiev­ing one or more of the organisation’s goals. Per­son­al devel­op­ment plan­ning, mean­while, should con­sid­er what behav­iours, skills or knowl­edge the indi­vid­ual needs to devel­op in order to suc­cess­ful­ly achieve their objec­tives and uphold the organisation’s values.

Tra­di­tion­al­ly, organ­i­sa­tions have placed a lot of their empha­sis on the Review” part of the cycle, often because a per­for­mance assess­ment is required for reward­ing pur­pos­es. How­ev­er, we have always advised that it is the Act” and Track” stages that are the most impor­tant. These stages are where per­for­mance is actu­al­ly deliv­ered and results are achieved. Indi­vid­u­als need to be encour­aged to sched­ule in reg­u­lar time to work on achiev­ing their objec­tives and per­son­al devel­op­ment plans. Sim­i­lar­ly, man­agers need to be check­ing in with their staff reg­u­lar­ly. They must give fre­quent feed­back and use coach­ing skills to help their team mem­bers over­come chal­lenges and iden­ti­fy oppor­tu­ni­ties for learn­ing and per­for­mance improve­ment. If this is left until an end-of-year review, it is too late; objec­tives and devel­op­ment plans may end up only being par­tial­ly achieved.

Notice that in the above per­for­mance man­age­ment cycle, there are no arrows between the four stages. This is because, in real­i­ty, the stages do not flow one after the oth­er. Act and Track should be con­tin­u­ous through­out the year. Reviews may take place at any point in the year and plan­ning may take place a num­ber of times dur­ing the year and be re-vis­it­ed, as the needs of the busi­ness change.

The new Con­tin­u­ous Per­for­mance Man­age­ment cycle

Since 2015, this phi­los­o­phy of con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment has been adopt­ed by lead­ing organ­i­sa­tions such as Microsoft, Deloitte, Adobe and Gen­er­al Elec­tric. All these major names have aban­doned tra­di­tion­al once-a-year per­for­mance appraisals in favour of reg­u­lar check-ins’ and fre­quent feed­back. These reg­u­lar per­for­mance dis­cus­sions are typ­i­cal­ly devel­op­men­tal and future-focused. They pro­vide an oppor­tu­ni­ty to explore what has gone well and how suc­cess can be repli­cat­ed again, any chal­lenges being faced and how they may be over­come and agree on actions that both the indi­vid­ual and man­ag­er need to take to devel­op the indi­vid­ual and fur­ther improve their performance.

Here is how this Con­tin­u­ous Per­for­mance Man­age­ment cycle typ­i­cal­ly looks in lead­ing organisations:

So what exact­ly is effec­tive per­for­mance management?

Hav­ing all of the ele­ments of the per­for­mance man­age­ment cycle in place is very impor­tant, but that will not nec­es­sar­i­ly lead to effec­tive per­for­mance man­age­ment for your organ­i­sa­tion. There are many oth­er fac­tors in play such as:

  • Hav­ing buy-in from lead­er­ship and senior man­age­ment to per­for­mance management
  • Ensur­ing that the per­for­mance man­age­ment cycle is con­tin­u­ous and not an annu­al process
  • Ensur­ing per­for­mance con­ver­sa­tions and reviews are mean­ing­ful and not tick-box’ exercises
  • Hav­ing easy to use per­for­mance man­age­ment soft­ware that sup­ports effec­tive per­for­mance man­age­ment and gives you vis­i­bil­i­ty of per­for­mance man­age­ment activity.
  • The skills and will­ing­ness of your man­agers to deliv­er effec­tive per­for­mance man­age­ment on a day-to-day basis

If you’d like to learn more about how to achieve these things and how to embed val­ue-adding, effec­tive per­for­mance man­age­ment process­es in your organ­i­sa­tion, read our free guide to suc­ceed­ing with Per­for­mance Man­age­ment. Just enter your details below and we will send you the guide straight away:

Curious about how Clear Review works?

Book a personalised demo to see how our performance management system could work for your organisation.

Book Demo