Clear Review has joined Advanced - Discover our full suite of powerful and innovative people management solutions

Find out more
Back to blog

Where now for performance management?

Future of performance management.

This last year has seen unprece­dent­ed changes in the field of employ­ee per­for­mance man­age­ment. It all start­ed with high pro­file organ­i­sa­tions such as Deloitte, Accen­ture and Gen­er­al Elec­tric announc­ing that they were aban­don­ing the tra­di­tion­al annu­al per­for­mance appraisal. This then start­ed a domi­no effect with more than 52 large com­pa­nies now mov­ing their per­for­mance man­age­ment process­es away from once-a-year per­for­mance reviews. Numer­ous oth­er organ­i­sa­tions are fol­low­ing suit. Whilst a lot has been writ­ten in the media about what is wrong with annu­al per­for­mance appraisals, less has been said about what the alter­na­tives are. So here are four prin­ci­ples of what I believe will under­pin tomorrow’s per­for­mance man­age­ment, based on my recent dis­cus­sions with HR lead­ers and what the lat­est research is telling us.

Dis­cov­er our 2020 Per­for­mance Man­age­ment Trends to see what’s in store this year.

Prin­ci­ple 1. Empha­sis on reg­u­lar, high qual­i­ty per­for­mance discussions

Per­for­mance man­age­ment process­es seem to have got lost in form fill­ing and box tick­ing. Lead­ing organ­i­sa­tions are now putting the empha­sis back on employ­ees and their man­agers hav­ing reg­u­lar con­ver­sa­tions, or check-ins’, through­out the year. Research from the Neu­roLead­er­ship Insti­tute found that 68% of com­pa­nies are rec­om­mend­ing quar­ter­ly con­ver­sa­tions or more. In prac­tice, the major­i­ty of HR lead­ers I have spo­ken to are rec­om­mend­ing month­ly check-ins, although they are giv­ing man­agers the dis­cre­tion to change this fre­quen­cy accord­ing to the needs of indi­vid­ual team members.

Prin­ci­ple 2. Fre­quent feedback

Mil­len­ni­als have now over­tak­en gen­er­a­tion X as the largest share of the work­force. These 18 – 34 year olds have grown up in a world of instant feed­back and for them, work should be no excep­tion. Yet a recent sur­vey by Wake­field Research found that 74% of mil­len­ni­als said they were in the dark” about how their man­agers and col­leagues think they are per­form­ing. To make mat­ters worse, over half of those sur­veyed said their man­agers are not pre­pared to give feed­back dur­ing per­for­mance dis­cus­sions. HR lead­ers are telling me they want to address this by using tech­nol­o­gy to allow feed­back to be giv­en in-the-moment’, at any time, and not just once-a-year as is often the case with tra­di­tion­al 360 degree feed­back. They want to encour­age more pos­i­tive feed­back, as well as con­struc­tive feed­back, and for col­leagues to get into the habit of giv­ing each oth­er feed­back, rather than feed­back being viewed as the domain of line managers.

Prin­ci­ple 3. For­ward-focused reviews

Do I think that per­for­mance reviews will die out? Prob­a­bly not. More than half of the HR lead­ers I have spo­ken to this year feel that there is still very much a place for hav­ing peri­od­ic longer term reviews in addi­tion to reg­u­lar check-ins. How­ev­er, they will be less about assess­ing past per­for­mance and focus more on agree­ing spe­cif­ic actions to build on past suc­cess­es, learn from mis­takes and enable per­son­al and career devel­op­ment. As Ellyn Shook, Chief HR Offi­cer at Accen­ture recent­ly said, Rather than tak­ing a ret­ro­spec­tive view, our peo­ple will engage in future-focused con­ver­sa­tions about their aspi­ra­tions, lead­ing to actions to help them grow and progress their careers”. Such a shift won’t take place overnight as it will require man­agers to adopt a coach­ing style when dis­cussing per­for­mance. There­fore, HR will need to focus their atten­tion on devel­op­ment man­agers’ coach­ing skills, rather than design­ing new appraisal forms.

Prin­ci­ple 4. Keep­ing things simple

The CEB has been advo­cat­ing for some time now that the HR pro­fes­sion has made per­for­mance man­age­ment too com­plex in an attempt to increase objec­tiv­i­ty. Whilst this was well inten­tioned, the net result has been unprece­dent­ed lev­els of dis­at­is­fac­tion, with over 75% of man­agers, employ­ees and HR heads feel­ing that per­for­mance man­age­ment results are nei­ther accu­rate nor effec­tive. Almost every HR per­son I have spo­ken to this year has told me that they want to sim­pli­fy their per­for­mance reviews. Com­mon themes emerg­ing are to pro­vide prompts for dis­cus­sion rather than detailed forms to com­plete, and drop­ping per­for­mance rat­ings and time-con­sum­ing cal­i­bra­tion process­es. Many organ­i­sa­tions are still using a paper-based approach and are increas­ing­ly look­ing at online per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tems to help to sim­pli­fy their processes.