Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter for inspiration, ideas and updates on the latest in performance management.

Back to blog

Who’s in charge of your hybrid model guidance?

Hybrid Model Guidance

Many would agree that hybrid is the future of work. The goal being to com­bine the pos­i­tives of both office and remote work­ing, to find a bal­ance that works well for your employees. 

Get­ting your hybrid mod­el right is key for the suc­cess of your organ­i­sa­tion. We all know that peo­ple are an organ­i­sa­tions most impor­tant assets, and tal­ent­ed peo­ple are going to want a hybrid mod­el that best suits their work­ing needs. A recent arti­cle in Forbes states – Mil­lions of work­ers plan to switch jobs in pur­suit of a work-Life bal­ance, growth oppor­tu­ni­ties, remote options and being treat­ed with respect’. We can see from this how much empha­sis is now being put on flex­i­ble work­ing and the option to work remotely.

Those who do well with their hybrid mod­el will bet­ter retain their cur­rent tal­ent pool, as well as attract­ing staff who leave organ­i­sa­tions who miss the mark. So hav­ing the right hybrid work­ing guide­lines is key, but who is going to be in charge of this? 

A lot of organ­i­sa­tions’ first reac­tion might be to put this respon­si­bil­i­ty onto HR staff, and whilst we can see the log­ic, we’d argue that’s pos­si­bly not the best route to go down. Mak­ing such a big deci­sion that will impact every employ­ee in an organ­i­sa­tion real­ly isn’t in the job descrip­tion of a HR employ­ee, and could cause some hos­til­i­ty towards HR from any employ­ees who are unhap­py with these decisions. 

HR is sup­posed to be an ally for all employ­ees, some­one to turn to with issues or queries, cre­at­ing hos­til­i­ty or mis­trust towards them could be very dam­ag­ing for your organisation. 

The oth­er option organ­i­sa­tions might look to is to let man­agers decide what form of hybrid work­ing is best for their team. Whilst this might have some mer­it, it could also cause prob­lems for man­agers, and between dif­fer­ent teams. If one man­ag­er decid­ed they’re team can work remote­ly 4 days a week, where anoth­er wants staff in the office 3 days a week, this could be deemed unfair. Clear bound­aries need to be set so no one will feel they aren’t being treat­ed as well as anoth­er per­son in the business. 

So what’s that answer? Deci­sions around hybrid work­ing could have a huge impact on your busi­ness, so we believe they should come from as high up in the busi­ness as pos­si­ble. Board mem­bers should be mak­ing these deci­sions and lay­ing them out to employ­ees in a clear way. Com­ing from a place of strong author­i­ty should reduce the push back from employ­ees, by show­ing that all board mem­bers are ful­ly behind these decisions. 

By set­ting clear bound­aries and being open with staff as to why these deci­sions have been made, peo­ple will be more like­ly to accept deci­sions, even if they aren’t com­plete­ly hap­py with them. Hav­ing the same bound­aries for every­one will elim­i­nate the issue of unfair treat­ment, this does nec­es­sar­i­ly mean all staff with be doing the exact same office / remote split, but it should mean that the rea­son for the split is clear. 

For exam­ple the guide­lines might state that employ­ees need to be in an office when per­form­ing cer­tain tasks, such as group meet­ings, or that all teams must have a least one day in the office togeth­er, but can choose where to work for the oth­er days. 

There’s no one per­fect answer to this, no right or wrong, how­ev­er there are organ­i­sa­tions who will suc­ceed and those who may not. By set­ting out a bad or unfair hybrid mod­el that makes many of your staff unhap­py, you are like­ly to lose some of your tal­ent to oth­er organ­i­sa­tions with bet­ter, more flex­i­ble hybrid work­ing rules. By hav­ing a good hybrid mod­el not only are you more like­ly to keep tal­ent in your organ­i­sa­tion, you will also be like­ly to attract more who are leav­ing oth­er organisations. 

Try to bear in mind that times have now changed for many. It used to be that peo­ple need­ed a good rea­son to work from home, now they need a good rea­son to come into the office. Many of your employ­ees will know that they are capa­ble of work­ing from home with no drop in their pro­duc­tiv­i­ty, they have adapt­ed to home work­ing, changed parts of their lives to fit it. So they will want to know why they must now return to an office space, spend­ing time and mon­ey on trav­el, leav­ing the qui­et and com­fort of their home to sit in a com­mu­nal space for x days a week. 

In order to be sure these guide­lines / bound­aries aren’t arbi­trary, deci­sion mak­ers should decide what they want to achieve from their hybrid work­ing mod­el, and work from there. They should be able to explain to all employ­ees why deci­sions have been made, so no one feels like they are being forced to work in loca­tions with­out a good reason.

When mak­ing any guide­lines around hybrid make sure you include some­thing around com­mu­ni­ca­tion. For exam­ple, man­agers must have a check-in with all of their staff at least once a month. Hybrid will be a new way of work­ing for many, and you need to be sure all staff mem­bers are being lis­ten too, so per­for­mance can be tracked and if a per­son is strug­gling they can be helped.

In con­clu­sion, our advice would be for board mem­bers to set the bound­aries for hybrid work­ing. These should be based on what will work best for the com­pa­ny to suc­ceed and employ­ees to be as hap­py as pos­si­ble at work. Once made, these bound­aries should be clear­ly com­mu­ni­cat­ed with all staff, with an expla­na­tion of why they are being put in place. These guide­lines should aim to ensure all employ­ees at an organ­i­sa­tion are being well looked after, with an empha­sis on con­tin­u­ous com­mu­ni­ca­tion between man­agers, staff and team members.

Want to see how Clear Review can help you?

If you want to see all the benefits of Clear Review, book a free demo.

Book a demo!