Back to blog

Employee engagement: Why you're measuring it in the wrong way

Meeting Engagement

Recent­ly, we ran a webi­nar on the sub­ject of per­for­mance and engage­ment. One of the polls we put to our audi­ence asked how often they con­duct­ed engage­ment sur­veys. The com­fort­able major­i­ty — almost 60% — said annually. 

There’s a lot to be said for mea­sur­ing employ­ee engage­ment annu­al­ly. It’s deeply sat­is­fy­ing to present the board with a 2% uplift in the engage­ment score, show­ing the con­text of the efforts you’ve gone to in the past year. It shows that things are work­ing as they should be and, in this rather hazi­ly defined world, we’re doing what we need to do. 

But what is engage­ment actu­al­ly for? What is the pur­pose of mak­ing peo­ple more engaged? We know we want peo­ple to be engaged. Every busi­ness looks for ways to moti­vate its employ­ees. It touch­es on that tricky sub­ject of non-finan­cial rewards: how can we moti­vate peo­ple beyond the pay rise? How can we make this a bet­ter, more reward­ing place to work? 

Work engage­ment is the key to productivity

The oper­a­tive word in that last sen­tence is work”. It’s what we spent most of our time doing, after all. If we want to mea­sure the right thing, we need to focus our engage­ment efforts on mak­ing the work bet­ter. We need to mea­sure work engagement. 

Work engage­ment is char­ac­terised by a sense of pos­i­tive well­be­ing and psy­cho­log­i­cal health in the work­place. Through work engage­ment, we’re more like­ly to have ener­gy when we apply our­selves to our tasks and teams. We find a sense of pur­pose through the work that we do. We’re more like­ly to immerse our­selves in our tasks; to improve our focus and resilience. But for orga­ni­za­tions to affect these vital attrib­ut­es, their efforts to boost engage­ment need to be ground­ed in the work itself. And their efforts to mea­sure it need to be both con­tin­u­ous (because work engage­ment is a con­tin­u­ous phe­nom­e­non that should prove resilient to life’s dai­ly ups and downs) and con­nect­ed to performance. 

How do you mea­sure per­for­mance con­tin­u­ous­ly? It’s a legit­i­mate ques­tion, espe­cial­ly for those whose annu­al engage­ment sur­veys can run to 50 ques­tions or more. There are far briefer ways to cap­ture infor­ma­tion relat­ed to engage­ment, but do they give the data we need? 

How the mea­sures of engage­ment stack up 

The quick­est, undoubt­ed­ly, is the eNPS mea­sure. It’s based around a sin­gle ques­tion — How like­ly are you to rec­om­mend work­ing at (this com­pa­ny) to a col­league or friend?”. The respon­dent answers on a scale of one to ten. Usu­al­ly, in cal­cu­lat­ing eNPS, the respon­dents answer­ing 9 or 10 are char­ac­terised as pro­mot­ers. Detrac­tors are those whose answer falls between 0 and 5, and pas­sives score 6 – 8. The chal­lenge here is twofold. First, this is a ques­tion about loy­al­ty, not engage­ment. They may pay par­tic­u­lar­ly well. They may do admirable work in char­i­ty, or the pub­lic sec­tor. They may be pres­ti­gious or par­tic­u­lar­ly well known. None of these things has any rela­tion to the tasks the work­er per­forms when they begin their day. Sec­ond­ly, pas­sive scores are usu­al­ly removed from the equa­tion after the sur­vey to give a clear view of the out­liers: the active pro­mot­ers or detrac­tors. If you’re pas­sive, your score doesn’t count. But if we want to get a clear pic­ture of our employ­ees, why are we focus­ing on the out­liers? Doesn’t everyone’s opin­ion count? And wouldn’t it be use­ful to under­stand why peo­ple are scor­ing 7? How do we get them up to a 9

The oth­er wide­ly used mea­sure is the Q12. Although many of the ques­tions on the list do touch on work engage­ment, 12 ques­tions is a lit­tle cum­ber­some to use con­tin­u­ous­ly. In an ide­al world, we would rec­om­mend that engage­ment is mea­sured month­ly (we’ll come on to why in a moment). Ask­ing peo­ple to step out of their flow of work for 12 ques­tions every month will soon cre­ate cyn­i­cism. The qual­i­ty of the data will suf­fer. Adop­tion rates will fall. 

Why mea­sur­ing engage­ment in a con­tin­u­ous way is essential 

The Utrecht Work Engage­ment Scale is the most robust and effec­tive mea­sure for work engage­ment cur­rent­ly in exis­tence. It uses 9 ques­tions which, again, is too oner­ous to work con­tin­u­ous­ly. But through exten­sive research and test­ing, we believe it can be honed down to three ques­tions. These are designed to mea­sure ener­gy, immer­sion and pur­pose. Sup­ple­ment­ed with a fourth ques­tion to inter­ro­gate employ­ee moti­va­tion, these ques­tions pro­vide a clear pic­ture of how employ­ees feel about their work expe­ri­ence. Sup­plied con­tin­u­ous­ly, this all works togeth­er to build an ongo­ing pic­ture of work engage­ment over time. This then feeds direct­ly into the per­for­mance man­age­ment process to prompt con­ver­sa­tions with man­agers and employ­ees which lead to gen­uine, mean­ing­ful action on work chal­lenges and oppor­tu­ni­ties. The con­tin­u­ous ele­ment is cru­cial. Why? Because we need to ensure that results aren’t influ­enced by a bad com­mute, ter­ri­ble weath­er or an argu­ment with a spouse. And we need to see change, and how per­for­mance man­age­ment is affect­ing engage­ment over time. 

To affect work engage­ment, we need to under­stand how peo­ple feel in an ongo­ing way. Action on this should hap­pen at a man­ag­er-employ­ee lev­el, not at the HR lev­el. And this all needs to work when action is need­ed — there and then — rather than in an annu­al sur­vey. If we do this, we can make a dif­fer­ence to both engage­ment and performance.

Our lat­est webi­nar — Per­for­mance, Engage­ment and Tech; The future of work­place pro­duc­tiv­i­ty — is avail­able on-demand. 

Download our eBook

Our latest eBook, Powering Performance with Engaged Employees, is available now.

Download the eBook here

Relat­ed articles

Employee engagement impacts the bottom line. Here's how.
Employee engagement impacts the bottom line in many ways. However, engagement is often overlooked by organizations, as they seek other methods to increase the bottom line with minimal cost. In this article, we explore how engagement increases productivity, employee retention and performance.
Read article
Employee engagement is not just HR’s responsibility. It’s everyone’s.
Employee engagement is not just HR's responsibility. To truly understand how engaged your employees are, everyone in an organization, from senior leaders, all the way to employees, should take some ownership of engagement.
Read article