Clear Review has joined Advanced - Discover our full suite of powerful and innovative people management solutions

Find out more
Back to blog

The Science behind the Power of Positivity

Image of sunflowers.

How can we keep our employ­ees moti­vat­ed and eager to excel with pos­i­tive feedback?

Feed­back is one of the best ways to help employ­ees stay moti­vat­ed. Research indi­cates that reg­u­lar feed­back cre­ates a cul­ture of learn­ing and devel­op­ing and encour­ages employ­ees to thrive and excel in their work. Direct and con­struc­tive feed­back on

per­for­mance and progress also helps employ­ees to feel val­ued and engaged. Yet giv­ing the right kind of feed­back can feel like a tightrope walk — an all-too-del­i­cate bal­anc­ing act.

Com­pa­nies are increas­ing­ly turn­ing away from out­dat­ed annu­al per­for­mance review sys­tems in favour of fre­quent feed­back, encour­aged by the results of oth­ers, such as GE and Microsoft. Yet with­out the right guid­ing frame­work, con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance reviews can end up being used to con­stant­ly crit­i­cise and nit­pick employ­ees’ weak­ness­es and mis­takes under the guise of con­struc­tive crit­i­cism”. The result? Employ­ees are left feel­ing micro­man­aged and patro­n­ised. Con­stant­ly cri­tiquing neg­a­tive qual­i­ties and prob­lem areas makes feed­back an unwel­come process, and when repeat­ed over time it can low­er self-esteem, induce feel­ings of resent­ment and frus­tra­tion and increase employ­ee stress.

Wor­ry­ing­ly, research shows that over one-third of feed­back leads to a drop in per­for­mance. A sur­vey con­duct­ed by Gallup found that only 27% of employ­ees strong­ly agree that the feed­back they receive actu­al­ly helps them to per­form bet­ter, while a stag­ger­ing­ly low 22% strong­ly agree that their per­for­mance is man­aged in a way that moti­vates and push­es them to improve. Even more trou­bling, inef­fec­tive feed­back can also have dev­as­tat­ing con­se­quences for the com­pa­ny. A study by Har­vard Busi­ness Review shows that employ­ees who gave their man­agers the low­est rank­ing for pro­vid­ing qual­i­ty feed­back were also in the bot­tom quar­tile for job sat­is­fac­tion, organ­i­sa­tion­al com­mit­ment and the desire to stay with­in the com­pa­ny. The con­clu­sion is clear — poor feed­back leads to low­er engage­ment and has an over­all neg­a­tive impact on the suc­cess of a company.

So what’s the solu­tion? Well, behav­iour­al sci­ence shows us that the best, most effec­tive, type of feed­back is the kind that focus­es on employ­ees’ strengths, suc­cess­es, ideas and accom­plished goals. It turns out that pos­i­tive feed­back is the most pow­er­ful tool for employ­ee motivation.

Pow­er of Positivity

The pow­er of pos­i­tiv­i­ty” may sound sus­pi­cious­ly hip­py, but research pro­vides a com­pelling case for pos­i­tiv­i­ty in the work­place. A Gallup sur­vey found that 67% of employ­ees whose lead­ers focused on their pos­i­tive traits and suc­cess­es were ful­ly engaged in their work in con­trast to the 31% of employ­ees whose man­agers focused on the neg­a­tives. Anoth­er sur­vey, by IBM, that cov­ered over 19,000 work­ers across dif­fer­ent indus­tries and organ­i­sa­tions, also high­light­ed the impor­tance of pos­i­tive feed­back. Here, a strong cor­re­la­tion was found between the engage­ment lev­el of employ­ees and pos­i­tive recog­ni­tion — with engage­ment three times high­er among employ­ees who received pos­i­tive feed­back com­pared to oth­ers who did not. And those staff who received pos­i­tive feed­back were also more like­ly to stay loy­al to the com­pa­ny. So, not only does pos­i­tiv­i­ty help to increase hap­pi­ness and moti­va­tion, but it also dri­ves reten­tion and ensures job sat­is­fac­tion.

Strate­gies for Effec­tive Pos­i­tive Feedback

Adopt­ing a pos­i­tive feed­back approach is not dif­fi­cult, although like any new habit, it takes prac­tice before it becomes the nor­mal way of doing things. Here are some of our top strate­gies for build­ing pos­i­tiv­i­ty into con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance reviews:

Play to employ­ee strengths

Pos­i­tive feed­back should focus on things like work achieve­ments, progress made towards goals and pos­i­tive demon­stra­tion of val­ues and behav­iours. Iden­ti­fy­ing an employee’s strengths not only boosts their moti­va­tion but also helps man­agers to iden­ti­fy and max­imise nat­ur­al abil­i­ties. For exam­ple, if an employ­ee has poor data analy­sis skills but con­sis­tent­ly proves them­selves to be a cre­ative and lat­er­al thinker, rather than berat­ing them for under­per­form­ing on data analy­sis, man­agers could instead assign them projects in which their cre­ative think­ing can be optimised.

A study of over 1.2 mil­lion employ­ees dis­cov­ered that 90% of groups that were put togeth­er and informed by employ­ee strengths saw far-reach­ing per­for­mance improve­ments: 7% high­er cus­tomer engage­ment; 19% increase in sales; 29% increase in prof­it; and a stag­ger­ing 72% low­er turnover and 15% increase in employ­ee engagement.

It’s sim­ple real­ly, by focus­ing on areas that employ­ees nat­u­ral­ly excel in, employ­ees are free to build on their strengths nat­u­ral­ly and organ­i­cal­ly rather than des­per­ate­ly attempt­ing to mas­ter skills that they find difficult.

But how can you iden­ti­fy employ­ee strengths and abil­i­ties? A sim­ple and effec­tive tech­nique is to include some strengths focused ques­tions in your check-in con­ver­sa­tions. Ques­tions like What aspect of your job do you find eas­i­er than oth­ers?” and What sit­u­a­tions to you feel most con­fi­dent in?” can be incred­i­bly pow­er­ful. Seek­ing feed­back from a wide range of sources is also help­ful as oth­er peo­ple often spot strengths that we don’t notice or recog­nise ourselves.

Once we have a clear sense of what employ­ees excel in, we can then focus our dis­cus­sions on how to lever­age those strengths fur­ther – for exam­ple assign­ing projects and tasks that play to those strengths and which also sup­port the employee’s per­son­al objec­tives and development.

Decon­struct the feed­back sandwich

The feed­back sand­wich is an overused tech­nique to dis­guise neg­a­tive feed­back by sand­wich­ing it between two com­pli­ments. Not only is this tech­nique uncon­vinc­ing and patron­iz­ing, it also shows a lack of man­age­r­i­al con­vic­tion and author­i­ty. Employ­ees are left feel­ing defen­sive, ashamed, and doubt­ing the valid­i­ty of the pos­i­tive com­ments. Of course, there are times when crit­i­cal or con­struc­tive feed­back is nec­es­sary and it can be incred­i­bly effec­tive. But as with all things, mod­er­a­tion is key.

Psy­cho­log­i­cal research recent­ly revealed that the most effec­tive ratio of pos­i­tive-to-neg­a­tive feed­back is 6:1. Fol­low­ing this ratio ensures that feed­back is used to boost con­fi­dence and encour­age employ­ees to push them­selves, rather than under­min­ing and berat­ing them. But that doesn’t mean that man­agers should pad out the sand­wich” and deliv­er six com­pli­ments every time a neg­a­tive com­ment needs to be made. Rather, it shows that man­agers should focus on giv­ing pos­i­tive feed­back reg­u­lar­ly so that when con­struc­tive feed­back needs to be giv­en, it can be giv­en con­fi­dent­ly with­out need­ing to be disguised.

Keep­ing track of how much feed­back you have giv­en as a man­ag­er can be hard. This is where con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment soft­ware can be help­ful. It tracks feed­back being giv­en and then flags to man­agers where feed­back is need­ed. It also enables pat­terns of neg­a­tive feed­back to be spot­ted and addressed.

Open up a two-way dialogue

Per­for­mance reviews are often a one-sided affair. All too often they become a man­ag­er-dri­ven mono­logue with lit­tle space for dia­logue and con­ver­sa­tion. Part of the blame lies in the lega­cy of annu­al appraisals with their focus on form com­ple­tion and rat­ings. These can end up sti­fling the best intend­ed con­ver­sa­tions. The result? Employ­ees are left feel­ing under­val­ued and as if their con­cerns are being ignored. In a Gallup study, only 2% of employ­ees who felt they were unable to approach man­agers with a ques­tion were engaged with their work.

And this is why annu­al per­for­mance reviews no longer work. When con­ver­sa­tions are sched­uled rigid­ly once a year, time con­straints dic­tate that the con­ver­sa­tion must sweep through an entire year of an employee’s work. There’s sim­ply not enough time to open up the con­ver­sa­tion to address spe­cif­ic ques­tions, con­cerns or ideas.

So it’s time to replace inef­fec­tive annu­al appraisals with reg­u­lar one-to-one check-in con­ver­sa­tions. This is obvi­ous­ly a mas­sive change for most organ­i­sa­tions, so we’ve writ­ten a free eBook on how to do it.

Address blind spots in giv­ing feedback

Every­one has blind spots — things that we do with­out us real­is­ing. When it comes to giv­ing feed­back, it may be the habit of nar­row­ing our eyes when we deliv­er it, or adopt­ing a harsh tone of voice when we are under pres­sure. How­ev­er pos­i­tive our inten­tions, these blindspots can cre­ate a rift between the intent and impact of our feedback.

How we deliv­er feed­back it is just as impor­tant as the words and inten­tion behind it. A recent study revealed the extent to which this is true. Here, two groups were observed: the first received neg­a­tive feed­back accom­pa­nied by pos­i­tive emo­tion­al sig­nals (such as smiles); the sec­ond received pos­i­tive feed­back with neg­a­tive emo­tion­al sig­nals (such as frowns). Those who received the pos­i­tive feed­back end­ed up feel­ing worse about their per­for­mance than those who received neg­a­tive feed­back in a good-natured way. So even if you’re giv­ing pos­i­tive feed­back, if the deliv­ery is neg­a­tive- employ­ees will still react poor­ly to it.

Address­ing blind spots like this can, how­ev­er, be dif­fi­cult. More often than not, we aren’t even aware of the tone and expres­sions we rou­tine­ly adopt. The only way to tru­ly get a sense of your feed­back deliv­ery is to ask your col­leagues — employ­ees and man­agers alike. By ask­ing peers ques­tions such as How did that come across?” and How did you feel after that feed­back I gave you yes­ter­day” blind spots will start to make them­selves appar­ent and any dis­cord between your intent and deliv­ery can be remedied.

Pos­i­tiv­i­ty is pow­er­ful, espe­cial­ly when pro­vid­ing effec­tive feed­back. Clear Review helps your man­agers to engage in more pos­i­tive con­ver­sa­tions and feed­back. Book in for a free per­for­mance man­age­ment soft­ware demo and find out how you can improve your organisation’s feed­back conversations.