Back to blog

Why is Performance Management Important?

Importance of performance management

What is per­for­mance man­age­ment? What are the ben­e­fits and impor­tance of per­for­mance man­age­ment? Find out how per­for­mance man­age­ment improves lev­els of employ­ee engage­ment, employ­ee reten­tion and com­pa­ny pro­duc­tiv­i­ty while enhanc­ing your bot­tom line.

CEOs, com­pa­ny direc­tors, influ­encers and big names in busi­ness reg­u­larly preach the impor­tance of effec­tive per­for­mance man­age­ment — the act of engag­ing with an employ­ee to review their ongo­ing work­place per­for­mance and devel­op­ment. The per­for­mance man­age­ment process com­bines infor­ma­tion gath­ering through mon­i­tor­ing goal com­ple­tion, feed­back and dis­cus­sions. By analysing suc­cess­es, strengths, learn­ing from mis­takes and exam­in­ing poten­tial for growth and devel­op­ment, busi­ness­es can devel­op tal­ent, enhance indi­vid­ual per­for­mance and weed out prob­lems. But this is eas­i­er said than done.

There are a num­ber of per­for­mance man­age­ment process­es, tools and approach­es com­pa­nies can take to inspire, mon­i­tor and man­age employ­ees. An effec­tive per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tem requires com­mit­ment and ded­i­ca­tion from the human resources depart­ment and man­agers and employ­ees. Below, we’ll explore why we should have employ­ee per­for­mance reviews at work (although not out­dat­ed and inef­fec­tive annu­al appraisals), how per­for­mance man­age­ment is chang­ing and the over­all impor­tance of per­for­mance man­age­ment to busi­ness success.

The Aim of Any Good Per­for­mance Man­age­ment System

There are many dif­fer­ent approach­es, tools and tech­niques involved in per­for­mance man­age­ment. No two per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tems will look the same. Just like com­pa­ny cul­ture, your per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tem will be unique and spe­cif­ic to your val­ues, your goals and your pur­pose. How­ev­er, every good per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tem seeks to work towards the improve­ment of the over­all organ­i­sa­tion­al per­for­mance, while sup­port­ing per­for­mance, pro­duc­tiv­i­ty and the well­be­ing of its employees. 

Ulti­mate­ly, every per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tem should ensure the achieve­ment of over­all organ­i­sa­tion­al goals and ambi­tions while align­ing them with employ­ee goals. In this way, per­for­mance man­age­ment and busi­ness objec­tives entwine with employ­ee well­ness and morale.

Why Do We Have Per­for­mance Appraisals at Work?

Every com­pa­ny wants its ranks filled with enthu­si­as­tic, ambi­tious employ­ees who per­form their roles per­fect­ly and always exceed expec­ta­tions. The real­i­ty, how­ev­er, is human beings are flawed. Some days, we might be moti­vat­ed to per­form, while on oth­ers, we might encounter prob­lems and obsta­cles that impede our progress and productivity.

We need per­for­mance appraisals to show employ­ees they have sup­port, to offer train­ing and devel­op­ment and to deliv­er reward and recog­ni­tion. When per­formed reg­u­lar­ly, per­for­mance reviews also allow com­pa­nies to pick up on seri­ous per­for­mance prob­lems, mean­ing they can be set right imme­di­ate­ly, rather than esca­lat­ing into more com­plex problems.

Con­tin­u­ous Per­for­mance Man­age­ment vs. Annu­al Appraisals

As men­tioned, there is more than one way to approach per­for­mance man­age­ment. Cur­rent­ly, there are two main approach­es when it comes to eval­u­at­ing per­for­mance and man­ag­ing tal­ent progression:

  1. Con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment (oth­er­wise known as Agile Per­for­mance Management)
  2. Tra­di­tion­al annu­al appraisals

65% of com­pa­nies are still using annu­al appraisals over a con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tem. This tra­di­tion­al approach of annu­al per­for­mance reviews entails a time-con­­sum­ing for­mal review that takes place once or twice a year. Dur­ing this review, an employee’s per­for­mance over the last six to twelve months is assessed and future tar­gets or objec­tives are set. Although they remain fair­ly preva­lent, annu­al per­for­mance appraisals are not an effec­tive per­for­mance man­age­ment process. Giv­en the exten­sive paper­work involved and the for­mal, back­­wards-look­ing nature of the reviews, they are also pret­ty uni­ver­sal­ly detest­ed by man­agers and employ­ees alike.

Con­verse­ly, con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment involves reg­u­lar, year-round check-in meet­ings com­bined with fre­quent real-time feed­back with the aim of improv­ing per­for­mance on an ongo­ing basis. Agile per­for­mance man­age­ment has tak­en off in recent years, as tech­nol­o­gy advances and our under­stand­ing of human psy­chol­o­gy and moti­va­tion improves. Fur­ther­more, busi­ness­es are recog­nising the prob­lems inher­ent with annu­al appraisals and are keen to move to new ways of man­ag­ing their talent.

But why is per­for­mance man­age­ment impor­tant at all? Why is it vital to mon­i­tor staff? What is the pur­pose of per­for­mance man­age­ment? What are the busi­ness ben­e­fits of the con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment cycle?

Looking for Performance Management Software?

Explor­ing the Impor­tance of Per­for­mance Man­age­ment and Con­tin­u­ous Feedback

Below we’ll cov­er the ben­e­fits and impor­tance of per­for­mance man­age­ment with regards to pro­duc­tiv­i­ty, indi­vid­ual per­for­mance and employ­ee engage­ment. We’ll explore how per­for­mance man­age­ment can help with employ­ee reten­tion, recruit­ment and pro­duc­tiv­i­ty while help­ing to accom­plish strate­gic objectives.

Per­for­mance Man­age­ment Encour­ages Employ­ee Reward and Recognition

Reward­ing and recog­nis­ing your employ­ees can be huge­ly ben­e­fi­cial to your busi­ness. A sur­vey by Amer­i­can Express revealed a third of com­pa­nies believe reward and recog­ni­tion sys­tems result in bet­ter staff reten­tion, while half also attribute greater moti­va­tion to offer­ing incen­tives. Mean­ing­ful reward and recog­ni­tion sys­tems can only oper­ate in busi­ness­es where there is an accu­rate and vis­i­ble process of per­for­mance feed­back and dis­cus­sions. Con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment enables man­age­ment to iden­ti­fy activ­i­ty and efforts wor­thy of praise or reward. In turn, this pro­motes a growth mind­set among your team members. 

Con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment allows man­agers to see when employ­ees go above-and-beyond. It helps them track progress against goals and per­son­al devel­op­ment and make informed deci­sions about addi­tion­al com­pen­sa­tion, such as pay-ris­es or bonus­es. Mean­ing­ful reward sys­tems are immense­ly impor­tant for employ­ee happiness. 

Here are a few key sta­tis­tics to consider. 

Per­for­mance Man­age­ment Helps to Boost Employ­ee Engage­ment and Productivity

Engaged employ­ees stay longer, active­ly involve them­selves in the work­place and pro­duce bet­ter results. Improv­ing lev­els of employ­ee engage­ment is key to boost­ing pro­duc­tiv­i­ty and max­imis­ing ROI. Per­for­mance man­age­ment, done well, is a vital tool for hav­ing engaged employees.

But how can we use per­for­mance man­age­ment to improve lev­els of employ­ee engagement?

Con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment cre­ates an ongo­ing dia­logue and an atmos­phere of trust, sup­port and encour­age­ment. It also helps devel­op a rela­tion­ship between employ­ee and com­pa­ny. If an employ­ee is aware that their man­ag­er and the busi­ness cares about what they are doing and is ded­i­cat­ed to help­ing them do bet­ter and progress their career — they are far more like­ly to engage with the company.

Con­sid­er a busi­ness where man­agers only speak to their employ­ees once a year about their progress. For most of the time, the employ­ee is not con­nect­ed to the direc­tion of the com­pa­ny or team. There is lit­tle con­se­quence, need or ben­e­fit to engag­ing. How­ev­er, when a com­pa­ny is con­sis­tent­ly engag­ing with its employ­ees, encour­ag­ing them to grow, and set­ting goals that stretch and devel­op them, there is a gen­uine con­nec­tion and increased like­li­hood of​”dis­cre­tionary effort.”

Per­for­mance Man­age­ment Helps to Cre­ate Employ­ee Devel­op­ment Strategies

Con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment means you are proac­tive­ly devel­op­ing employ­ees by cov­er­ing their devel­op­ment needs. With reg­u­lar catch-ups, you can pur­sue con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance improve­ment, as you fre­quent­ly meet to dis­cuss each employee’s per­for­mance, pos­si­ble devel­op­ment oppor­tu­ni­ties and devel­op­ment plans. By com­bin­ing this with flex­i­ble per­son­al devel­op­ment objec­tives, busi­ness­es can cul­ti­vate tal­ent in a way sim­ply not pos­si­ble with once or twice year­ly per­for­mance conversations. 

Use the infor­ma­tion you col­lect about an employee’s past per­for­mance and cur­rent efforts, and the dis­cus­sions you have, to grow their tal­ent. Use strate­gies that not only play to employ­ees’ strengths but also reflect the direc­tion the busi­ness is heading. 

Hav­ing a con­sis­tent under­stand­ing of your employ­ees’ abil­i­ties, an agile plat­form that allows you to reg­u­lar­ly shift pri­or­i­ties — and focus on new areas of devel­op­ment —pro­duces an envi­ron­ment where your work­ers are con­stant­ly mov­ing in a direc­tion that pro­vides the max­i­mum pos­si­ble ben­e­fit to your com​pa​ny​. By fail­ing to con­sid­er the impor­tance of per­for­mance man­age­ment, the employ­ee-busi­­­ness focus can become mis­aligned, goals can become irrel­e­vant and employ­ee poten­tial squandered. 

Per­for­mance Man­age­ment Allows for the Exchange of Feedback

The impor­tance of feed­back in per­for­mance man­age­ment can­not be over­stat­ed. Employ­ees want feed­back — and they want it reg­u­lar­ly. They need (and deserve) to know how they are per­form­ing and how they can improve. Fur­ther­more, they should have the oppor­tu­ni­ty to give feed­back on their com­pa­ny and man­age­ment. This is the only way com­pa­ny process­es can evolve and become more streamlined.

Per­for­mance Man­age­ment Cre­ates Clar­i­fi­ca­tion Con­cern­ing SMART Goals

It is sur­pris­ing and rather wor­ry­ing to hear that stud­ies have shown around 50% of employ­ees aren’t clear on exact­ly what their role with­in the work­place is or what long-or-short-term goals they are try­ing to achieve.

Lack of clar­i­ty is anoth­er rea­son why effec­tive per­for­mance man­age­ment is so impor­tant. The right per­for­mance man­age­ment process­es can elim­i­nate ambi­gu­i­ty and con­fu­sion about goal set­ting. Hav­ing reg­u­lar, future-focused con­ver­sa­tions through con­tin­u­ous review helps to ensure employ­ees are clear on every­thing they are sup­posed to be doing and what is expect­ed of them. Con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment also encour­ages employ­ees to be more involved, giv­ing them the auton­o­my to set goals rel­e­vant to them, their strengths and organ­i­sa­tion­al goals — thus pro­vid­ing employ­ees with added own­er­ship and moti­va­tion. All of this will help them take con­trol of their performance.

The process also ensures man­age­ment is in touch with the work being deliv­ered and able to iden­ti­fy when per­for­mance is drop­ping off as a result of lack of job clarity.

Why Do Per­for­mance Man­age­ment Sys­tems Fail?

With so many advan­tages of per­for­mance man­age­ment, why are so many man­agers and employ­ees dis­pleased with their exist­ing process­es? Why do so many per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tems go wrong?

Lack of Communication

Per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tems suc­ceed when com­mu­ni­ca­tion is authen­tic and trans­par­ent. Com­pa­nies should utilise an open-door pol­i­cy and encour­age clear lines of com­mu­ni­ca­tion through­out the organisation. 

They Set Inef­fec­tive Goals

Goal set­ting needs to be just. Goals can’t be too easy, or employ­ees won’t feel sat­is­fied — most peo­ple enjoy a chal­lenge. They want to be stretched and to devel­op new skills. Equal­ly, how­ev­er, goals that are too chal­leng­ing can be demo­ti­va­tion­al. Employ­ees will burn out try­ing to accom­plish them, or they won’t try at all, believ­ing them to be impossible.

Effec­tive goals should be set col­lab­o­ra­tive­ly, between man­ag­er and employ­ee. They should be SMART and tracked reg­u­lar­ly. On top of this, reg­u­lar meet­ings should be held to dis­cuss goal progress and what can be done to sup­port the employ­ee in this respect.

Your Man­agers Aren’t Engaged with the Process

Some­times, bad man­agers hap­pen to good per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tems. The real­i­ty is, no per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tem will be suc­cess­ful if the peo­ple involved don’t invest in the process, or will­ing to make it suc­ceed. If employ­ees sense their man­agers are apa­thet­ic about the per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tem, they will mir­ror this atti­tude. Man­agers need to take con­trol and lead by example.

Many Com­pa­nies Col­lect the Wrong Per­for­mance Man­age­ment Data

Tra­di­tion­al­ly, per­for­mance man­age­ment has focused on data. It used to be the norm to use per­for­mance rat­ings. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, there is a big prob­lem with per­for­mance rat­ings. Stud­ies have found them to be far from moti­va­tion­al and they have been shown to impact per­for­mance negatively. 

Oth­er exam­ples of per­for­mance man­age­ment data include stack rank­ing sys­tems, which keep employ­ees in a per­ma­nent state of stress and pro­mote unhealthy com­pe­ti­tion between employees.

This isn’t to say all per­for­mance man­age­ment data is bad. It’s the type of data you col­lect that mat­ters. Rather than plac­ing a heavy empha­sis on your employee’s per­for­mance and what they are doing wrong, it is best to shift your atten­tion to the big­ger pic­ture. How often are employ­ees and line man­agers meet­ing to dis­cuss per­for­mance? How often is feed­back deliv­ered? How sup­port­ed and encour­aged do employ­ees feel in their roles? Track­ing this type of data is much more help­ful and will pro­mote a health­i­er, more pro­duc­tive work­ing environment.

These are just a few rea­sons why per­for­mance man­age­ment is as essen­tial now as it ever was. Some tools are moti­va­tion­al and tech­niques (such as stack rank­ing) will leave your employ­ees demo­ti­vat­ed and dis­en­gaged. It’s impor­tant to remain up-to-date with per­for­mance man­age­ment trends and to fre­quent­ly inter­act with your employ­ees to find out how you can improve your per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tem to get the most out of your team.

Find out how you can boost per­for­mance with Clear Review

Per­for­mance man­age­ment is vital but easy to over-com­­pli­­cate. Sim­pli­fy your per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tems with Clear Review’s inno­v­a­tive soft­ware pur­­pose-built for agile goals, con­tin­u­ous feed­back and mean­ing­ful con­ver­sa­tions. Book a free guid­ed demo of our soft­ware now. 

Book a free demo of Clear Review

Relat­ed articles

Why Some Organisations Are Having Problems After Ditching Performance Ratings
According to recent news articles, some organisations have encountered problems after dropping their annual performance ratings. We examine some of the reasons behind this.
Read article
How does Continuous Performance Management improve business productivity?
Learn how performance management software improves business productivity by enabling SMARTer objectives, real-time feedback and regular check-ins.
Read article